Skip to content
MedRostrum

MedRostrum Academy · Reference library

AI Governance Library

Explore healthcare AI governance frameworks, what they mean for doctors, and the original sources behind them.

Educational reference only. Coverage differs between jurisdictions; guidance is not automatically legally binding. Check the current primary source and your organisation’s policies before relying on it.

Explore the evidence

Framework explorer

19 frameworks · 11 regions · 51 sources

Showing 19 of 19

GlobalInternational health ethics guidance

WHO ethics and governance for health (2021)

Six principles guide responsible health AI: preserve autonomy, protect patients, make systems understandable, assign responsibility, support fairness and access, and keep evaluating wider impacts. The guidance informs governance; it is not a worldwide law or product approval.

What this means for doctors

Ask whose interests the tool serves, whether it works for your patients, and who reviews harm or complaints.

Common misconception

Ethical AI only means avoiding biased training data.

Original sources (1)
GlobalInternational generative AI guidance

WHO guidance on large multi-modal models (2024)

This guidance extends health ethics to generative AI. It highlights inaccurate or incomplete answers, bias, inappropriate reliance and security risks. It recommends defined tasks, clinician and patient involvement, and evaluation after deployment. Its recommendations do not automatically become national law.

What this means for doctors

Check whether the tool has suitable evidence for the specific clinical task, and review outputs before relying on them.

Common misconception

A model that handles many general tasks is suitable for any clinical purpose.

Original sources (1)
GlobalNon-binding intergovernmental recommendation

UNESCO Recommendation on AI ethics (2021)

UNESCO places human rights, dignity, inclusion and environmental wellbeing at the centre of AI governance. It connects these values with policy actions and ethical impact assessment. Member States are encouraged to apply the Recommendation voluntarily.

What this means for doctors

Consider who may be disadvantaged, whose views were included, and impacts beyond the immediate clinical outcome.

Common misconception

Adoption of the Recommendation creates identical enforceable rules in every country.

Original sources (1)
GlobalNon-binding intergovernmental recommendation

OECD AI Principles (2019; updated 2024)

The OECD principles promote beneficial AI, rights and fairness, transparency, dependable systems and accountability. The 2024 update addresses developments including generative AI. OECD recommendations are political commitments, rather than directly binding laws.

What this means for doctors

Ask what information supports informed use, how an output can be challenged, and how a harmful system can be corrected or withdrawn.

Common misconception

Transparency is satisfied simply by adding an AI-generated label.

Original sources (1)
GlobalVoluntary risk management framework

NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 (2023)

Developed in the United States for use across sectors, NIST organises AI risk work into Govern, Map, Measure and Manage. Teams establish responsibility, understand context, assess evidence and act on risks. These are continuing functions, not a one-time checklist. NIST states that version 1.0 is being revised.

What this means for doctors

Identify the intended use, the evidence required, the responsible owner and the action to take if performance deteriorates.

Common misconception

Completing a NIST checklist certifies that a tool is safe or legally approved.

Original sources (2)
GlobalVoluntary risk management companion profile

NIST Generative AI Profile (2024)

This companion to NIST's framework addresses generative AI risks, including invented information, privacy breaches, unequal performance, inappropriate reliance, security and third-party dependencies. It warns that fabricated patient summaries and apparently convincing explanations can mislead clinicians.

What this means for doctors

Verify important facts and references against appropriate sources; assess how the tool behaves when information is missing or uncertain.

Common misconception

Asking AI to explain an answer proves that its explanation and supporting references are correct.

Original sources (1)

Showing 6 of 19 matching frameworks

Understand the terminology

Clinical AI Glossary

Plain-English definitions of 21 important AI governance terms.

Showing 21 of 21

AI literacy
Knowledge and skills that help people understand AI's uses, limits, opportunities and risks in their role.
AI management system
The organisation's policies, responsibilities and processes for governing AI.
Assurance
Evidence and assessment used to judge whether relevant requirements and safeguards have been met.
Automation bias
Giving an automated recommendation undue weight instead of examining the available evidence.
Calibration
How closely estimated probabilities match observed outcomes in the population being assessed.
Clinical validation
Evaluation of whether a system performs appropriately for its intended clinical purpose and population.
Deployer
A person or organisation using an AI system under its authority; the exact legal definition depends on the relevant framework.
DPIA
Data protection impact assessment: a structured assessment of risks that processing creates for people's information rights.
Drift
A change over time in data, context or relationships that can alter the performance of a system.
External validation
Testing on data from a setting, period or population outside the model’s development dataset. A random hold-out from the original dataset is internal validation, not external validation.
Generative AI
AI that produces content such as text, images, audio or code.
Hallucination or confabulation
An AI output that presents invented or unsupported information as if it were factual.
Hazard log
A maintained record of hazards, possible harms, assessed risks, controls, responsible people and outstanding issues.
Intended purpose
The use a product is designed and claimed for, as described through relevant instructions, labelling and promotional material.
Interoperability
The ability of systems to exchange and use information appropriately.
Model update
A change to the model or related product that may alter behaviour, performance or scope.
PCCP
Predetermined change control plan: a defined plan for specified device changes, their evaluation and implementation.
Provider
An entity supplying or developing an AI system in a defined role. This can mean something different from a healthcare provider.
Safety case
An evidence-supported explanation of why a particular system and deployment are considered acceptably safe.
Sensitivity and specificity
Sensitivity concerns identifying people who have the target condition; specificity concerns identifying those who do not.
Special-category data
Under UK/EU data-protection terminology, information given additional protection, including health data.

Original source directory

All 51 references provided with the course. Links lead to external publishers.

Source details are reproduced from the course reference dataset; links and legal status require editorial verification before publication. A source's recorded access date does not guarantee that it remains current.